Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7261 - 7280 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Garcia, 315 P.3d 117 (Cal. 2014), that an otherwise-qualified undocumented immigrant who is present in the United States without lawful authorization, may be admitted to the California bar. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:05 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking to represent a class of all persons in the United States who have purchased Wesson Oils from 2007 on. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
The Supreme Court granted review to decide whether this violates the free exercise clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:14 pm
The purchaser alleged negligent misrepresentation and violations of the California Unfair Competition Law and the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA).The class was defined in the purchaser's memorandum of points and authorities as all persons in the United States who purchased a Connect 3D product from Buy.com, Inc. that included a rebate offer and whose rebate submissions were approved for payment, excluding anyone who was paid a rebate by… [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
But I've got a legal theory that I'm totally excited to expound on why this means that I own all the red cars in California. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am by JB
Schwarzenegger case in federal district court in California, which makes a direct assault on state marriage laws. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:47 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (“Standard Stations”) the Supreme Court devised what has become known as the “quantitative substantiality” test. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Code makes it a crime, among other things, tobring[] into the United States . . . or knowingly use[] any express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) (! [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:17 am
United States, No. 06-876L (Feb. 22, 2008), a San Diego, California-area property owner sued the federal government in the Court of Federal Claims for just compensation, complaining of the Border Patrol's violation of its property rights:As a result of these initiatives since September 11, 2001, IIP states that Border Patrol agents occupy Parcel 11 on an around-the-clock basis. [read post]