Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 7261 - 7280 of 22,872
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2006, 12:08 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeCourt Erred in Imposing Adverse Non-Guidelines Sentence Absent Notice of Its Intention to Do So United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 11:33 am by Catherine Glenn Foster
It’s time to get the Supreme Court out of the business of overseeing the “national abortion control board” and to restore this sensitive and politically polarizing issue to the states and the people – where it has always belonged. *** Past cases linked to in this post: Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
During the course of clinical trials conducted in the United States some years later, Cephalon noticed that the formulation used by them displayed increased side effects as compared with equivalent doses tested in European clinical trials. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:18 am by Calvin Massey
  If Congress has a national character it follows that the "people of the United States," not just the people of each state in isolation, have an undivided interest in the composition of that body. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:09 am by Nicole Huberfeld
Nevertheless, Professor Rubin has furnished a fresh take by proposing that the ACA expresses a legislative interpretation of positive constitutional rights that articulates a right to healthcare in the United States. [read post]
The WHPA makes explicit that access to abortion services is essential to health care and the ability of people to “participate equally in the economic and social life in the United Sates. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
United Parcel Service, Inc., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 6568293 (W.D. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:03 am by Jason Cheung
This sounds a little puzzling given the climate of the present election, but the United States has succeeded in electing almost every one of its Presidents without violence (the Civil War being the exception). [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:03 am by Jason Cheung
This sounds a little puzzling given the climate of the present election, but the United States has succeeded in electing almost every one of its Presidents without violence (the Civil War being the exception). [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:25 am by Chelsea Gray
The 2011 Wisconsin Act 23, a strict voter ID law, was recently challenged in the United States District Court located in Wisconsin. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
  And it went on to explain that [t]o that end, the United States Supreme Court has considered the type of speech at issue when determining the appropriate standards to apply in defamation cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]