Search for: "v. JONES" Results 7261 - 7280 of 9,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm by David Lat
But we haven’t seen a complaint this juicy since Allgood v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
  There is already jurisdiction, deriving from the case of Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) to strike out a case as an abuse of the process if the publication does not amount to a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
Difficulties began when the House of Bishops took up the one Constitutional amendment which had passed at General Convention 1889, namely, an amendment to Article V which would allow General Convention to accept from any diocese a cession of some of its territory, to become a missionary diocese. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Jones,  No. 08-0335/NA. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm by INFORRM
The defendants’ grounds for the application to strike out were as follows: That the claim and its real purpose was to circumvent the rule in Derbyshire v Times Newspapers Limited [1993] AC 534 (“Derbyshire”)] which prevents the Governing Body of Durand School, as a governmental body, from suing for libel; That its effect was circumvent the rule which prevents the Governing Body of Durand School, as a public authority and hence a body without Article 8 ECHR rights, from… [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am by Kali Borkoski
Ashby Jones also has a post on Wialliamson at the Law Blog in which he observes that the Court’s 2000 decision in Geier v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:20 pm by John Hochfelder
While RSD injuries and symptoms vary quite widely from one person to the next (and they manifest in different parts of each person's body), the appellate court did not discuss any of the cases which have dealt with pain and suffering damages for injuries leading to RSD, most of which we have discussed, here, here and here, such as: Jeffries v. 3520 Broadway Management Co. (1st Dept. 2007)[$1,500,000] Jones v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:12 am by Rosalind English
The defendants’ grounds for the application to strike out were as follows: That the claim and its real purpose was to circumvent the rule in Derbyshire v Times Newspapers Limited [1993] AC 534 (“Derbyshire”)] which prevents the Governing Body of Durand School, as a governmental body, from suing for libel; That its effect was circumvent the rule which prevents the Governing Body of Durand School, as a public authority and hence a body without Article 8 ECHR rights, from… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:00 pm by J
So, without further ado, lets turn to Regent Management Ltd v Jones [2010] UKUT 369 (LC), a service charge appeal to the Upper Tribunal. [read post]