Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 7281 - 7300 of 21,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
” Connecticut AG Members Oppose State Ebook Licensing Bill — “On April 19, 2024, more than 60 Authors Guild members from the state of Connecticut sent a letter to leaders in both houses of the Connecticut General Assembly voicing their concerns about Senate Bill 148 and House Bill 5312. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
Other parts of the Bill of Rights similarly protect long-established rights, and they have not been applied to the states by the Supreme Court, the panel noted. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Following the announcement of the government’s Fraud, Error and Debt Bill, a group of  privacy and rights groups, including Disability Rights UK, Age UK, Privacy International, Child Poverty Action Group and Big Brother Watch have published a joint letter to Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Liz Kendall, expressing concerns about the “mass financial surveillance powers” that the legislation would introduce. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:07 am
"Local attorney Bill Groth, who represents the plaintiffs in the Indiana case, has an article on the status of the Crawford v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:00 am
04/21/09 Mirror of Justice Blog:"Here are a couple of letters to the speaker of the Connecticut house arguing for meaningful religious liberty exemptions in the bill [to implement the state supreme court's October 2008 decision in Kerrigan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
”  Bill Mears of CNN, David Savage of the L.A. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:57 am by Stephen Bilkis
As Held in People v Costello, the law may seek to legislate morality, but it must do so without offending the constitutional protections of the due process clause and the right of privacy. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:46 am by Nabiha Syed
Monday’s coverage of the Court continues to focus on Perry v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court heard arguments in Armour v. [read post]