Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 7281 - 7300 of 44,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2022, 3:30 am by Allison Brownell Tirres
This is the important work that Amanda Frost does in her article on the canonical 1898 case United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:29 am by Gregory Forman
Two years after the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:36 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Although it did not fully address this question, a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Pipino v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
’s opposition to returning to Peru and desire to remain in the United States was not an abuse of discretion. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:00 am by Eric Caligiuri
Smith & Nephew, case number 19-1458, the Supreme Court of the United States recently held that Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) judges are unconstitutionally appointed. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Citing with approval the recent  judgment of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am by Jane Chong
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am by Jane Chong
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:30 am by Pilar G. Kraman
Specifically, Nikon Americas’ argued that because it does not “make, use, offer to sell, sell, or import into the United States the allegedly infringing products or, in fact, any products whatsoever[,]” it cannot be found to infringe the patent-in-suit. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:23 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The United States Supreme Court will hear Chiafalo v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm by Steven Cohen
  In addition, the court states that Wiley produced an itemized bid of unit costs per square foot. [read post]