Search for: "Davis v. Davis" Results 7281 - 7300 of 8,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 28 March 2017, Popplewell J handed down judgment in Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters [2017] EWHC 644 (QB). [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
In the case of Versi v express.co.uk IPSO found that there had been no code breach. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
Massachusetts got it exactly right; Davis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts got it exactly right; Davis v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am by Richard Hunt
Davi, LLC, 2:21-CV-00273-MCE-DB, 2022 WL 256867, at *5 (E.D. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Part Two detailed the line of Supreme Court precedent going back more than a century rejecting ISL premises, at least in federal election contexts (as distinguished from other places the Constitution refers to state “legislatures”), including Davis v. [read post]
15 Jun 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Kersch meticulously explicates those different narratives within the modern conservative movement, charting how they shared, as a “motivating and unifying rallying cry,” the “call for constitutional restoration and redemption” (367).Constitutional scholars in recent decades—including Jack Balkin, Peggy Cooper Davis, Reva Siegel, and Serena Mayeri—have identified the critical role of constitutional memory, including the stories people tell about the… [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 11 July 2019 Master Cook handed down judgment in the case of Osagie v Serco Ltd and Ors [2019] EWHC 1803 (QB). [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Challenge to Will based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence rejectedIN RE ESTATE OF TORNABENDOCKET NO. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jennifer Davis persuasively argues that changing economic and social conditions allowed the courts, in trade mark cases, to abandon a view of consumers as heterogeneous and divided by class, education and income and instead to assume the existence of an average consumer whose perceptions were key. [read post]