Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 7281 - 7300 of 12,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2024, 6:45 am by Eric Goldman
The court is way off-base here for reasons I explain in this article. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm by David Kopel
I, sect. 8, cls. 15-16) give Congress the power to arm the militia and to call it forth. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su ­preme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia also explains, sentencing under the guidelines is “based primarily on two factors”, which are the conduct associated with the offense” (i.e., what, precisely did the defendant do) and the defendant’s criminal history (i.e., how many, if any, prior criminal convictions does the defendant have). [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  When I defend cases, I don’t put the safe harbor front & center. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 3:02 pm by Josh Blackman
I didn't used to think Roe must be overruled. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here's the abstract from the paper:The Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Brady v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But, as with libel, liability for disclosure of private facts does little to deter judgment-proof defendants, especially when they victimize poor potential plaintiffs. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
It does not run in parallel with it. [read post]