Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 8,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2017, 10:51 am
Supreme Court precedent, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has held that SSA benefits are not subject to equitable distribution.[5] Yet this case law does not necessarily mean that the receipt of SSA benefits has no place in the Court’s determination as to how to divide the rest of the marital estate. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:49 am
A similar result was reached by the California Court of Appeals in 2005 in Anderson, McPharlin & Connors v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:49 pm
Bank v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
In Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:54 am
Superior Court of the State of California, et al. (2014 Cal. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:33 am
Supreme Court's decision in Katz v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:57 pm
En vísperas de las vacaciones, y hechas publicas durante el mes de agosto, se dictaron dos importantes sentencias del Tribunal Constitucional que suponen “la vuelta a la normalidad” del recurso de casación de interés autonómico. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 2:30 pm
Barko v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 8:28 pm
Contempt suggests looking down upon or treating as inferior the object of one’s feelings (Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:28 pm
Bank v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:43 pm
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals declined to decide this split of opinion in the unpublished case of Fox v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:03 pm
"Principle IV "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him".This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's orders'".Previous to the time of the Nuremberg Trials, this excuse was known in common parlance as… [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Supreme Court to reconsider in light of Carey v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
Plaza Auto Center, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
Centre For Research On Globalization 2010 QCCS 2119 the Superior Court of Quebec dismissed a libel action based on publication on a website under the provision of the Code of Civil Procedure which permits a claim to be dismissed if it “restricts freedom of expression in public debate“. [read post]
