Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 15,479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The Hague Protocol of 23 November 2007 is part of EU law. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
On June 23, 2016, the divided and deadlocked Court ruled: “The [lower court] judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 2:15 pm
See also related report published Jan. 2015.The GCC ‘Must Rethink its Refugee Strategy’ (Refugees Deeply, June 2016) [text]"In First, Israel Grants Refugee Status to Sudanese Asylum Seeker," +972 Magazine, 24 June 2016 [text]The Middle East Migration Crisis: Genesis and Responses, London, 20-23 June 2016 [access]- Follow link to Facebook page for videos from conference.Migration Profile: Morocco, Policy Brief, no. 5 (Migration Policy Centre, 2016) [text]Syria’s… [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:16 am
Importantly, liability under the FCPA does not require that false records or deficient controls be linked to corrupt payments. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
This survey does not reflect the experiences of persons age 26 or older. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:54 am
See, e.g., 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
CVSG: 05/23/2016. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:33 pm
The only precedent does not bode well for a quick process. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
“Brexit and data protection: What does it mean for you? [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
In the words of the referral— “Does the first sentence of Article 23(1) of [the Regulation] preclude a licensee who is not registered …from bringing proceedings alleging infringement of a Community trade mark? [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 7:22 am
Good news for the Johnson brigades nervously checking SOS dockets, as the 1-year Johnsondeadline loomed. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8544, both ask essentially: (1) whether Johnson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:18 am
On remand, a Fifth Circuit panel ruled, 2-1, that UT Austin presented sufficient evidence to prove that its admissions program is narrowly tailored to achieve the compelling state interest of the educational benefits of diversity (98 EPD ¶45,109). [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
So the solution is to urge a law that gives authority to the Office of Civil Rights that Title IX does not? [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 pm
XI, sec. 3(1)). [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
., § 15126.4(a)(1)(C).) [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:22 pm
The question presented to the Supreme Court of New Jersey was whether the state’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD), embodied in N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -42 and which prohibits discrimination based on marital status, prohibits discrimination not only based on the status of being single or married, but also the status of being separated or divorced. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:00 am
The case reference is Art. 23 1/16, incidentally.Readers can access the document here. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:25 am
Ct. filed May 23, 2016). [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:10 am
However, our inquiry does not end with this holding. [read post]
