Search for: "English v. English" Results 7281 - 7300 of 9,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2010, 12:28 pm by Susan Brenner
[Calderon] yelled at Ortega in English. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
  We posted a case comment on this and Rosalind English’s survey of the other coverage. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers heard 12 December [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:40 am by Ronald Mann
The justices finished up the first week of the new term by finally hearing argument in Google v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:37 pm by Danielle D'Onfro
On Wednesday, October 16, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Rotkiske v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Stern, a California lawyer; no dice, said the district court in Stern v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
For analysis of how the focalisation criterion raises issues for online content published in English, see Karyn Harty, Audrey Byrne and Lesley Caplin’s piece for McCann FitzGerald here. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The types of format-related accommodations currently provided include: Unified English Braille (UEB) version of the LSAT Large print (e.g., 18-point font or higher) test book Screen-readable HTML test (including, where applicable, use of screen-reader software (e.g., JAWS)) Alternate non-Scantron answer sheet Marking answer choices in the test book Use of line marker Use of magnification devices (e.g., magnification reading glasses, handheld video magnifier, closed-circuit television… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  The immunity for witnesses in judicial proceedings from liability for damages related to their testimony originated in English common law.See Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
The Bookseller reported that the “trade bodies” welcomed the Bill – referring to the Publishers’ Association, the Society of Authors and English PEN. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Four people described as “sports stars” have become the latest celebrities to be named in American publications despite having injunctions in English courts. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The ability of English courts to excise trivial claims from the daily court lists has been given legislative punch with the enactment of section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013, which requires plaintiffs to surmount the “serious harm” threshold in order to establish liability. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  This gap of 368 days between libel jury trials appears to be the longest in English legal history. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
  The immunity for witnesses in judicial proceedings from liability for damages related to their testimony originated in English common law.See Briscoe v. [read post]