Search for: "English v. English" Results 7281 - 7300 of 11,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2012, 5:43 pm by INFORRM
Similarly established English and European authority was also cited in relation to the cautious approach that should be exercised by the courts in relation to prior restraints on the media. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:54 am by Josh Wright
 They are very familiar in the antitrust community — Alfred Kahn in New York v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that several Asian-American groups have filed an amicus brief opposing the University of Texas’ affirmative action program, which is being challenged in Fisher v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
” Mr Justice LeBlanc, delivering judgment also considered the principles set out by the Canadian Supreme Court in Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 and R v Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442 (“the Dagenais/Mentuck test”), namely that a request for a publication ban may be ordered when: (a)   such an order is necessary in order to prevent a serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonably alternative measures… [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
Bankruptcy court of 23 July 2008 against the appellants for payment of various sums of money in excess of $8 million be enforced as a judgment of the English court? [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:59 am by sally
“Last week Rosalind English did a summary post on the important Supreme Court case of Lukaszewski and others, R (on the application of Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20 – read judgement. [read post]
27 May 2012, 4:07 pm by David Hart QC
Last week Rosalind English did a summary post on the important Supreme Court case of Lukaszewski and others, R (on the application of Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20 - read judgement. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:07 am by Wessen Jazrawi
In the courts Scoppola v Italy (No. 3) – 126/05 [2012] ECHR 868 (22 May 2012). [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:00 am by Ronald Mann
PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY:  The Court this week in Freeman v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:38 am
 This is the result of Case C-98/11 P Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM, which (at time of writing) has not yet been made available in English [but it's in English now, here. [read post]