Search for: "In Interest of Jones"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 7,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Interesting or scary, you be the judge. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
§ 546(e) when a financial institution acts as a mere conduit for fraudulently transferred property, or whether instead the safe harbor applies only when the financial institution has its own beneficial interest in the transferred property; and (3) whether the 2nd Circuit correctly held – contrary to the Supreme Court’s decisions holding that it is for Congress, and not the courts, to balance the multiple purposes of the Bankruptcy Code, and that courts must therefore rely… [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
Goldfarb describes himself as "an attorney with an interest and expertise in linguistics, and in applying the insights and methodologies of linguistics to legal interpretation. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:30 pm
Are you a paralegal Who’s wondering if you should go to law school? [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
(Jones v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Webb v Jones [2021] EWHC 1618 In Webb, the Defendant issued an application for an order that the particulars of claim be struck out in [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
ExxonMobil Aims to Use a Radical Texas Law to Silence Its Critics – in California Mother Jones – Chris McGreal | Published: 1/18/2022 ExxonMobil is attempting to use an unusual Texas law to target and intimidate its critics, claiming lawsuits against the company over its long history of downplaying and denying the climate crisis violate the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
The $55 million “Cemetery Trust” was uncovered by the excellent bankruptcy attorneys representing the creditors committee, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, and Jones, led by Jim Stang, the most experienced archdiocesan bankruptcy attorney in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on September 6, 2022. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
We’re always open to flattery, and it’s flattering to us when somebody thinks that we provide the best legal research available (at least without a prescription). [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 5:12 am
The sources made several conclusive claims, including that “there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones to storm the Capitol and take hostages” and that there was “no evidence” that the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys had “serious” plans for what to do if they made it inside the facility. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 3:00 am
His refusal to sign the documents allows him to circumvent fundraising rules that put limits on private contributions to the transition, along with ethics rules meant to avoid conflicts-of-interest for the incoming administration. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the aftermath of Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
Carvin of the Washington office of the Jones Day law firm, representing the National Federation of Independent Business and four individuals, who are Federation members. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:41 am
” However, Cohen still “had a campaign email address and, at various times, advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press, and made televised and media appearances on behalf of the campaign” (The Guardian; Cohen Criminal Information, pp. 11-12). [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
NLRB Law Memo 10/12/2007 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It comes as no surprise that the Supreme Court of Georgia rejected constitutional challenges to the Daubert rule on expert testimony in the newly released decision of Mason v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
If you’re interested in that topic, definitely take a listen to that as well. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Florida Drug Statute Constitutional - Breaking News Update July 12, 2012 - The Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion today in State v. [read post]
