Search for: "In re Doe" Results 7281 - 7300 of 107,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2006, 9:12 am
* Look at us, we're patrons in training! [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
The Federal Circuit has recently issued some highly controversial decisions, such as In re Bilski now before the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 7:01 am
PAKISTAN'S WAZIRISTAN ACCORD with the Taliban/Al Qaeda remnants has failed, and they're using the safe haven to reconstitute. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 10:08 pm by Steve Baird
Today, we’re not talking about that Purple Rain, that Color Purple, or those Purple People Eaters, and we’re especially not talking today about Purple Gloves, Purple Bags, Purple Jackets, Purple Candy Wrappers, or Purple Tags, no today, we’re talking about “The Purple Pill,” a/k/a Today’s Purple Pill — AstraZeneca’s blockbuster Nexium brand acid reflux medication. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 8:22 am
If you have a plan in place to handle the worst if it does occur, taking that new step won't seem as scary. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:42 am by MBettman
In re Adoption of H.N.R., 2015-Ohio-5476 ( Mere existence of putative father’s biological link does not  merit equivalent to constitutional protection.) [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:10 pm
  If you’re like most lawyers (myself included), it’s sometimes difficult to make sure that everything that needs to get done does get done. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 5:02 am by SHG
High school kids do silly things, both because they’re kids and, well, that’s what one does in high school. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:44 pm by Matthew David Brozik
If the federal copyright complaint that you file on behalf of your client includes an assertion that “[the d]efendants… knew or should have known that they were violating [the p]laintiff’s rights,” then you probably want to be sure that you’re not bringing an ill-conceived lawsuit, because what copyright law does cover in this country—and what it doesn’t—is something a lawyer should know. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:51 am by Gregory B. Williams
Robinson in In Re Class 8 Transmission Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, Civil Action No. 11-00009-SLR (D.Del., October 21, 2015), the Court denied plaintiffs’ class certification motion, found the case does not present a case or controversy under Article III, and dismissed the case. [read post]
12 May 2015, 11:23 am by David M. Ward
Do you remember explaining what a lawyer does and making it as interesting as possible? [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:46 am by Matthew Landis
If you’re interested in leadership development and live or work in Lancaster, you should absolutely check out Leadership Lancaster and its programs. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:13 pm by Steven Boutwell
Ct. 134 (1927), does not apply when a damaged party shifts some of its own injury to a third party by contract. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 10:47 am by David M. Ward
When you’re making plans for the coming year, the first you should do is review the previous year. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:13 am by John L. Welch
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the logo shown immediately below, for "clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops and tops," under Sections 1, 2, and 45, finding it to be "primarily an ornamental feature of the goods" that "does not function as a trademark for the goods. [read post]