Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 7,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2008, 4:17 pm
Stress positions for up to four hours. 2. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:30 am
Before we take our leave of this tale, here are a few notable links: 1. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:26 pm
The Ruggie Report posits three “core principles”: (1) the State duty to protect human rights, (2) the corporate social responsibility to respect human rights, and (3) the need for access to appropriate remedies for human rights abuses.We believe the basic concepts embodied in the Report are sound and should be supported by the business community in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:12 am
POTS, vertigo, cranial nerve damage - are all clear markers of traumatic brain injury.The Character Assassination: Soldier #1 back pains prior to deployment; Soldier #2, heavy drinker with domestic problems. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 3:42 am
The man, referred to as John Doe in the suit, and the 16-year-old, identified only as K.K., both told a CYS caseworker that they waited until she was 16 to have a physical relationship, according to the suit, filed in federal court in Pittsburgh. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:32 am
Call this the "John Kerry" approach. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 7:11 pm
Even assuming that one of YAF's members does have a sufficient injury-in-fact, YAF has not shown: (1) that such injury was caused by the Secretary's actions; or (2) that the injury will be redressed by the relief it has requested in this lawsuit. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) John Korp v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
, which is slated for an Aug. 1 vote. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 11:59 am
This vision included (1) a doctrine of preemptive war, (2) new surveillance techniques, including domestic surveillance, (3) a new system of preventive detention, including detention of american citizens without access to courts, (4) the creation of legal black holes like Guantanamo Bay and CIA black sites, (5) use of torture and torture-lite to obtain information, (6) enhanced secrecy and classification policies, and (7) a version of unitary executive theory that claimed… [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:18 pm
" OK, I say, but what does NovusLaw actually do? [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
§ 22-3-3-13(h)(2), must be met by considering only Worker's Compensation benefits. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:45 pm
For what it's worth, (1), (3), and (4) all seem like weak explanations to me, but this being a state secret and all, I have no idea. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 1:50 am
The Court first determined that Plaintiffs established a prima facie case of copyright infringement by showing (1) ownership of a valid copyright and (2) unauthorized copying. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:06 pm
This S2KM blog post summarizes a new article by John J. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 10:14 pm
However, the description of the settlement in the 10-Q does at least suggest some serious questions. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:06 pm
By John AnthonyLabor Code section 510, subdivision (a) mandates that an employer pay an employee time and one-half for (1) more than eight hours of work in one workday, and (2) more than 40 hours of work in any workweek. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
KG, Opposition No. 91174518 (May 28, 2008) [precedential].Opposer B&L filed for summary judgment on the ground of likelihood of confusion, but the Board sua sponte chose to rule on the contract issue.The agreement provided that Applicant may use nine particular marks: (1) KARL STORZ GERMANY; (2) STORZ-GERMANY; (3) KARL STORZ; (4) KARL STORZ USA; (5) KARL STORZ ENDOSCOPY-AMERICA; (6) KARL STORZ ENDOSCOPY; (7) STORZ ENDOSKOP; (8) KARL STORZ ENDOSKOP; and(9) KS STORZ.… [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
: (Spicy IP) Events 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 13-14 June: Centre for European Economic Research conference on ‘The… [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:45 am
A Public Defender has a post discussing a proposed change to the Connecticut Code of Evidence which "would permit a statement made by a child to be admissible in lieu of live testimony," if certain circumstances were met: 1) the court would have to find the statement trustworthy; 2) the statement was not made in preparation for litigation; and 3) the child either testifies and is subject to cross-examination or is otherwise unavailable. [read post]
