Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 7281 - 7300 of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2020, 3:48 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
The defendant asserted that it was not to blame for the plaintiff’s accident and, thus, was not liable to him for payment of his medical costs, compensation for pain and suffering, and/or other damages allegedly caused by his fall. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:03 am by John Bellinger, Sean Mirski
Cueto and Havana Docks both involved defendants who allegedly used plaintiffs’ property directly—Pernod, by using Conac Cueto’s assets in its distribution network; and Norwegian, by docking its cruise ships at Havana Docks’s property. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:54 am
The other three defendants were deemed liable to the following extents: Fel Pro - 30%, Crane Company - 20%, and Cleaver Brooks - 10%. [read post]
24 May 2007, 6:11 am
., et al. (05/18/2007): appeal of decisions granting judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that the individual defendant was personally liable for inducement of infringement and denying JMOL that the jury's award of lost profits to the patentee was not supported by substantial evidence, and cross-appeal of the grant of summary judgment that the corporate defendant is not the alter ego of the individual defendant (reversed-in-part and affirmed-in-part);… [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:23 am
The medical center was not a defendant in the case, but the jury found two doctors, Jose Colindres and Sedigheh Zolfaghari, liable for Haylee's injuries. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:25 am by Harry Styron
Lounce appealed to the Western District of the Missouri Court of Appeals, claiming that the trial court erred in finding her personally liable and in finding the trust liable. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:31 am by Neumann Law Group
A person can legally be held liable for another’s wrongful death under two circumstances: (1) if the person’s negligence causes the death of another; or (2) if they willfully or recklessly acted and this act caused the death of another. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:33 am by Mark Zamora
SARVIS,A10A0538, A10A0539.The issue presented in these appeals is whether, under recently amended OCGA § 51-12-33, a trier of fact is required to apportion its award of damages among multiple liable defendants when the plaintiff bears no fault.The Court held: "It is clear from that subsection's plain language that the legislature did not intend for apportionment to be limited to those cases wherein the plaintiff was to some degree at fault. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 12:18 pm by emagraken
I conclude it was the defendants string of actions (looking to the canyon, and trying to get back in position instead of waiting on the shoulder) that caused the accident. [55]         For all those reasons, I find the defendant 100% liable for the accident. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:57 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
For example, a third-party plaintiff would have to prove: That the defendant provided the patron with alcohol; That there were compensable injuries suffered by the accident victim; That the alcohol provided was that which intoxicated the patron; and That the patron’s intoxication was at least one cause of the accident or injuries. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a separate count, the complaint alleges that the remaining individual defendants are liable to the plaintiff class as Control Persons under Section 20 of the Exchange Act. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
In a civil case, the plaintiff only has to prove that the defendant is liable for plaintiff's injuries by a preponderance of the evidence, whereas in a criminal case, the prosecution has to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 4:03 am
Yet a defendant threatened with punishment for injuring a nonparty victim has no opportunity to defend against the charge.Taking a look at the Lindsey case reveals that it's not a "punishment" case at all, but rather a civil landlord-tenant dispute, in which the Court stated "Due process requires that there be an opportunity to present every available defense. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 1:39 am
PRACTICE NOTE: Officers of corporations or LLCs that authorize and direct infringing activities can be held personally liable. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Deborah now brings these state and federal lawsuits in her own right and as a representative of Robert’s estate. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:51 pm by John Stigi
The new precedent set by the Jesner plurality decision reflects this Court’s hesitation to engage in what its consider judicial overreach. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court unanimously dismisses the appeals holding that the Fairchild exception applies to cases of mesothelioma involving a single defendant and that there is no requirement for a claimant to show that the defendants breach of duty doubled the risk of developing the disease. [read post]