Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 7281 - 7300
of 21,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [1] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine: The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its importance as a pathogen has… [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 2:59 pm
The Applicant contested this evidence stating that although the goods may emanate from one source, the goods are sold under different marks. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:24 am
Roth, Introduction Mark Janis & Noam Wiener, Treaties in US law from the Founding to the Restatement (Third) Gregory H. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am
(quotation marks omitted). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 3:39 am
Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
On October 17, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case Mark Schwartz, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Kathleen Schwartz, et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:02 am
The letter, however, was returned, marked “return to sender. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
In the case of Barth v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:34 am
So the Tennessee Supreme Court is really interested in making sure the mandate of Gideon v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
” (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 11:53 am
In a filing on Tuesday, the justices denied certiorari in Bahlul v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:03 am
Indeed, I would go on to say that the fact that there is a co-existence agreement in two Member States indicates that there is a likelihood of confusion in other Member States where the parties haven't struck a deal to prevent it.I would also have made sure that the UK co-existence agreement made clear that if the junior trade mark owner wanted to enter the Spanish market, there would have to be a new agreement. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:29 am
In 1989, the Supreme Court found in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 6:36 am
Additional Resources: Kumar v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:24 am
Mark Berman of the Washington Post reports that it was the state's first execution since the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:05 am
Additional Resources: Johnson v. [read post]
