Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 22,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
The 1909 Copyright Act changed the rules. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:48 am
This may bolster the case that entity-level taxes on pass-through firms comply with the TCJA and IRS rules. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 6:53 am
The New York State Department of Labor (“NYSDOL”) recently announced that it would no longer pursue employee scheduling regulations concerning “call-in” (or “on-call”) pay and other so-called predictive scheduling matters. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:50 am
The appeals court did not consider the statute of limitations ruling because it was not a final appealable order. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
Certainly this is true in cases applying the fair market value standard deriving not from state law but from generally accepted appraisal doctrine as embodied in a number of IRS revenue rulings. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 9:33 am
Accordingly, the case cannot, in Wilkins’s view, be dismissed as a matter of law at this time. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
Supreme Court to re-examine the landmark Sullivan ruling. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 4:02 am
For all of these reasons, the SCOV adopts a bright line rule: the trial court is not to accept an appearance from an attorney who already, at some point during the proceedings, appeared on behalf of another party. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 2:38 am
Congress or the courts would have to rule on those assumptions. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm
The FCC issued a proposed rule that would implement recently adopted amendments clarifying the Truth in Caller ID Act’s “prohibition on the use of misleading and inaccurate caller ID information. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 11:24 am
In common parlance the opinions are called “non-published”, but truth is that they are published and you can read them but the court adopted a rule that they had no precedential value and could not be cited as authority, even though they were dispositive in the case decided. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
Bill n°1097: Right-to-Disconnect Act was introduced in the National Assembly to ensure that employee rest periods are respected by requiring employers to adopt an after-hours disconnection policy. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 5:39 am
Her action, seeking monetary damages, is only loosely related to her other legal matters. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
" Concluding that the Comptroller's determination was not supported by substantial evidence, the Appellate Division ruled that it must be annulled and remitted the matter to the Comptroller "for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
" Concluding that the Comptroller's determination was not supported by substantial evidence, the Appellate Division ruled that it must be annulled and remitted the matter to the Comptroller "for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 2:49 am
But interesting, if the Bill would in some form be adopted and when applied to foreign acquirers, the proposed regime would most likely also fall within the scope of the new EU Regulation on the framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union which was adopted by the European Parliament on 14 February 2019. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:02 pm
The 21 Principles report cites policies adopted by lead prosecutors in Seattle and Philadelphia as example implementations of the recommended approach. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm
Nevertheless, it tended to the view that the simulation method underlying claim 1 of each request did not contribute to the technical character of the invention and that the subject-matter of claim 1 of each request lacked inventive step.V. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
At the very least, however, it has already sparked debate about draft registration, sex discrimination, and more.Those are important matters of general public concern, but the district court ruling in NCM also raises a question of special interest to judges and lawyers: Did the judge even have the authority to rule as he did? [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm
In Zarb-Cousin -v- Association of British Bookmakers [2018] EWHC 2240 (QB), Mr Justice Nicklin sought to bring some clarity to the issue:- “ …some caution must be applied before overly prescriptive rules are adopted as to the assessment of fact or opinion. [read post]
