Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 13,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2013, 5:41 am
See State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 9:13 pm
Via SCOTUSBlog: Issue: (1) Whether a state may, consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, compel personal care providers to accept and financially support a private organization as their exclusive representative to petition the state for greater reimbursements from its Medicaid programs; and (2) whether the lower court erred in holding that the claims of providers in the Home Based Support Services Program… [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:21 pm
The petition of the day is: Knappe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
These are the two government petitions the Court accepted, and a summary of the issues at stake: * United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
But a few things interested me on today’s list: – A grant in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
The panel’s decision, Gershengorn summed up, has made for uncertainty, and brought on the United States’s petition for review by the full appeals court. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
make the petition all but doomed — it’s simple error correction, which the Court shys away from, and the United States is opposing the petition. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm
United States, and I have very little of substance to add to Jen Daskal’s thorough analysis over at Just Security, or Marty Lederman’s addendum thereto. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:19 am
United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
In the case of Hope v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
It was a good question and one that the Chapter 7 Trustee and United States Trustee had considered. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:04 am
In light of uncertainty surrounding the U.S. government's ability to operate after Monday (September 30) due to a budget impasse in Congress, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) today filed a contingent motion with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, requesting in the event of a government shutdown a postponement of a Motorola v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
By way of rejoinder, the United States insisted that the parties had not relied upon the documents, before the lower court or in their appeals briefing. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
The law states that in absence of a U.S. or the foreign equivalent degree, in order to qualify for H-1B position, the beneficiary can show education, specialized training, and/or progressively responsible experience that is: (1) equivalent to completion of a United States baccalaureate or higher degree in the specialty occupation, and (2) the beneficiary has to show recognition of expertise in the specialty through progressively responsible positions directly related to… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
This flows from the SCC decisions in Ontario (AG) v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm
The petitions of the day are: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:25 am
” In the Boston Review, Pam Karlan explains why the Court’s recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:15 am
Indeed filers such as Google have based entire petitions on 102(e) art in some cases. [read post]
