Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 17,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2007, 12:27 am
This could revive the equal protection claims that were made in the Stewart v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:49 am
Take the case of Michael Harris v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:12 am
He is being held without bail at the Joseph V. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:56 am
Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:39 pm
McMahon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 8:49 am
In 2012, in Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:54 pm
Per the United States Supreme Court's unanimous ruling in Mississippi v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Preserve Your ObjectionsIn the slip and fall case of Showers v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:20 am
But Section 1983 only applies to the states. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:55 am
Dentsply Sirona, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
After the jury convicted on both counts, the defendant claimed he needed an evaluation of his mental health for the first time. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:04 am
From Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:12 am
" Is anyone keeping count of how many times the Court has "overruled Lemon"? [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
” It is apparent from United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm
The National Park Service’s decision to re-open 22.7 miles of trails to off-road vehicle use in Big Cypress National Preserve was illegal, a federal judge in Florida decided today (Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 3:18 am
Summary of Decision issued February 12, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Montez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 2:38 pm
Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. [read post]