Search for: "State v. Chance" Results 7281 - 7300 of 12,119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm by Jim Chen
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm by Jim Chen
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm by Jim Chen
zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
You chances of getting evidence suppressed or criminal charges dismissed will increase if you have qualified legal representation of a criminal defense attorney. . [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:10 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The new petition and appendix were filed in Pedersen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 9:41 am by Orin Kerr
” It seems difficult to me to square that conclusion with the Second Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]