Search for: "State v. Click"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 10,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 5:03 pm
Court filings do not disclose the aggregate retail value of goods that are still eligible to be returned, but do state that Anchor Blue's historical return rate is approximately 3.2% of all goods sold. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm
Click here for a complete version of State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:16 pm
" Access the complete opinion (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:15 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States is currently considering this same question in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:01 pm
The case is Sabaski v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:41 am
The State has filed its brief in Bullcoming v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
For previous IPKat reports on the battle click here.Viacom v YouTube: Viacom's appeal argumentsFollowing YouTube's summary judgment success in the Viacom litigation last year it was no surprise that Viacom, supported by several amici curiae, would appeal Judge Stanton’s June summary judgment (here and reported here). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:00 pm
Click here for details and advance registration information. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
The case followed another related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:31 pm
Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Case No. 09-5388, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Owensboro. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:17 am
In the recent domain name dispute of LD Products, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
At one point, the Deputy Minister tells the Agent that he will “keep him in the loop” about other bids and states that the last bidder might have “certain advantages. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:15 am
UNITED STATES 09-1272 KENTUCKY v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 10:17 pm
On January 12, 2011, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Kentucky v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 5:33 pm
See 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
Cuttic v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 11:49 am
This latter particular reason for anonymity irks Fish, who argues that Justice Stevens went astray in his majority opinion in McIntyre v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:41 am
In the case of Bruesewitz v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:41 am
In the case of Bruesewitz v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
The proper standard for admitting hearsay statements of children was succinctly stated in State v. [read post]
