Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 14,486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2014, 9:28 am
For now, we don't know why the government wants to block the Restis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:14 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
In 2013, the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 11:20 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
Finally, in Sweden, the Wall Street Journal writes that the new center-left Lofven administration has recognized the state of Palestine, becoming one of the first EU member states to do so and drawing Israeli ire. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
V. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:07 am
For instance, last year, a three-judge panel of the 3rd Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
All of those would have been losing arguments. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am
This question was answered first when gaming was in its infancy, but still remains quite relevant in today's world of gaming and law.The case in question was Atari v North American Philips Consumer Electronics, decided by the United States Court of Appeals in 1982. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
What’s the relevance of the economist v. legal scholars? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Massachusetts Attorney General Sues Federal Agencies In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v Federal Housing Finance Agency et al., a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley in which she accused mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of violating a state law meant to prevent Massachusetts residents from losing their homes to foreclosure. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Cotton & Ors, R (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWHC 3437 (Admin) This was the Liberty backed judicial review of the bedroom tax regulations on the basis that the regulations amounted to an article 8 breach, or an article 14 breach read with article 8, or that the regulations were irrational. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695, 710-11 (D.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Chief Justice Lamer has stated extra-judicially that “[t]he Charter can be understood to give effect to Canada’s international legal obligations, and should therefore be interpreted in a way that conforms to those obligations. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 5:32 am
See Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:04 am
Accordingly, the assessments would have to be paid because this was needed to protect the owners from losing their real property. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:10 pm
State v. [read post]
Trial court loses jurisdiction to enforce plea agreements after sentencing, rules Ohio Supreme Court
22 Oct 2014, 12:47 pm
As reported by Court News Ohio, the case before the court, State v. [read post]
