Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 57,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
“While the Supreme Court found that the family-care provisions are narrowly targeted to address the significant wrong of sex-based discrimination in family-leave policies, ‘[t]he same cannot be said for requiring the States to give all employees the opportunity to take self-care leave. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
In Zbegner v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:50 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
The Claimants had sought to rely on an observation made by Lord McNally, the Minister of State in charge of the Bill, in the House of Lords Grand Committee debate of 17 December 2012, when he said: “Our view is that the serious harm test would raise the bar to a modest extent above the requirement of the current law. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm
In AEI Ltd v Phonographic Performance Limited [1999] 1 WLR 1507, Lord Woolf MR stated: “…it is no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly to be deprived of his costs of a particular issue on which he has failed. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
* Further, in Matter of Froehlich v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Sander v Westchester Reform Temple 2024 NY Slip Op 03064 Decided on June 5, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Sander v Westchester Reform Temple 2024 NY Slip Op 03064 Decided on June 5, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
* Further, in Matter of Froehlich v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 5:01 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:58 am
The bill would overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in Reigel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
But obtaining a future spouse's signature by "trick" or "artifice" will invalidate a premarital agreement, said the Dallas Court of Appeals in Moore v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
The case is State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:13 am
In Miller v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm
Yesterday in Cullen v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:10 pm
Grutter v. [read post]
