Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 9:08 am
Whether the stalker hails from the United States, Brazil, Canada, Kenya, Philippines, or any other country, it certainly won’t be the last. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm
United States is one such case. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:09 am
United States, 842 F.Supp. 299 (N.D.Ill.1993) (monitoring by penile plethysmograph as valid condition for parole), aff'd, 35 F.3d 277 (7th Cir.1994). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
In late May 2008, the United States - in response to the Court's late January call for the views of the Solicitor General - filed a brief in which it urges the Court to grant certiorari. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:20 am
" Because this case "involves no securities listed on a domestic exchange, and all aspects of the purchases complained of by those petitioners who still have live claims occurred outside the United States" the Petitioners have "failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted" and the Court therefore affirmed the dismissal. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 4:26 am
United StatesHund v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
A joint federal/state task force began a local operation to search for absconders and to conduct searches on supervisees. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
See also United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
” Many other states followed suit. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
” Many other states followed suit. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am
Texas, 21-5050Issues: (1) Whether Texas’ Court of Criminal Appeals, the only court of last resort reviewing direct appeals in death penalty cases, has decided an important federal question concerning a racially biased juror being allowed on a capital death penalty jury in violation of petitioner Kristopher Love’s rights under the Sixth and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution; and (2) whether Texas’ Court of Criminal Appeals, the only court… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
For direct liability, the Anti-Terrorism Act provides: Any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefor in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney’s fees. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Appellee stated that he was in fear of physical harm. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]