Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2010, 7:24 am
To the case page for United States v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 7:33 pm
Systemic problems with court-supervised guardianship have previously been noted by organizations such as the National Association of State Units on Aging (NASUA). [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:38 am
Such was the case with, for example, the weighty claim by a group of Gitmo detainees that winning their habeas cases entitled them to release in the United States. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:19 am
Such was the case with, for example, the weighty claim by a group of Gitmo detainees that winning their habeas cases entitled them to release in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:02 pm
The United States asserts, and petitioners cannot credibly dispute, that all of the attributes of a facility exposed to the vagaries of war are present in Bagram. [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:15 pm
United States, No. 09-1408. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:05 am
Third, that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to convict her of conspiring to defraud the United States. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am
Moreover, should the United States government again deny plaintiff's request for a visa, thereby precluding her appearance in New York for deposition and/or trial, her ability to proceed with this litigation could be severely hampered, despite the fact that her complaint survived defendants' motion to dismiss. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:22 pm
This article considers how the state and appellate courts may have resolved Davis’s motions as well as Davis’s second or successive writs under AEDPA, and explains why AEDPA presents obstacles to petitioners asserting actual innocence. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:18 am
But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the… [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
Opinion below (8th Circuit) For 09-821: Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of respondent Tim Reisch Brief in opposition of the United States Petitioner’s reply to brief of Tim Reisch Petitioner’s reply to the brief of the United States For 09-953: Conditional cross-petition Brief in opposition of respondent Charles Sisney Brief in opposition of the United States Title: Mayo Foundation for Medical… [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:07 pm
” The Court explained that the text of the Convention, the views of United States Department of State, decisions by foreign courts addressing the meaning of “rights of custody,” and the purpose of the Convention all lead to the conclusion that A.J.A. was indeed “wrongfully removed. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Florida, United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
United States Supreme Court Decision: May 17, 2010 In a 5-4 opinion by Justice Kennedy, the United States Supreme Court ruled that sentencing juveniles to life without the possibility of parole for non-homicide cases is impermissible under the Eighth Amendment’s cruel and unusual punishment clause. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 pm
Thus, as petitioner contends and respondent does not contest, the United States is the only Nation that imposes life without parole sentences on juvenile nonhomicide offenders. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:08 pm
Abbott and United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:36 pm
§ 7513(f), and with emissions emanating from outside the United States, see 42 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:23 pm
Florida, striking down state statutes sentencing juveniles to life without parole for crimes other than homicide: [A]s petitioner contends and respondent does not contest, the United States is the only Nation that imposes life without parole sentences on juvenile nonhomicide offenders. [read post]
