Search for: "mark"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 135,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2006, 7:59 am
[Mark Godsey]... [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:59 pm
[Mark Godsey] [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:40 pm
Mark Shelden reports.... [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:44 pm
Mark Shelden blogs.... [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:50 am
Mark Brown for Jurist. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:39 am
...to mark the 55th anniversary. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:22 am
Mark Lance (Georgetown) comments. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 6:13 am
Mark Barabak LAT column. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:43 am
So says Mark Gersh. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:43 am
Courtesy of Mark Alfano (Delft). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:37 am
In general, registrars will only be required to apply the rights protection mechanisms associated with the new domains to nationally or internationally registered marks which owners must enter into a new “Trademark Clearinghouse”. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:01 pm
The marks are identical and as you acknowledge, the services are the same. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 11:41 pm
"Registering our half a millionth Community trade marks is a very important milestone. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:47 pm
Emilio Valentino had applied to register a mark identical to the Applicant's, in Italy. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 11:09 am
In its judgment, the Court dismissed part of Direct Line's claim that the marks were confusingly similar in accordance with S. 5(2) of the Trade Marks Act. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:22 am
Here the mark AQ was simply too different from the cited mark PARADISE MAKEUP AQ, both for cosmetic/makeup items, to support the Section 2(d) refusal. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:50 pm
‘impulse' vs. careful, sophisticated purchasing. (5) The fame of the prior mark (sales, advertising, length of use). (6) The number and nature of similar marks in use on similar goods. (7) The nature and extent of any actual confusion. (8) The length of time during and conditions under which there has been concurrent use without evidence of actual confusion. (9) The variety of goods on which a mark is or is not used (house… [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
In a colorfully illustrated opinion crafted by Judge Bucher (whose "trademark" is the deft use of Photoshop), the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark BOBBLE POPS [BOBBLE disclaimed], finding the mark merely descriptive of candy. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
" Thus Hiraga acknowledged that Arena had used the mark prior to his April 14, 2005 filing date. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:36 am
Viterra argued that its standard character mark should not be construed so broadly as to cover the distinctive form of the cited mark, that the marks are phonetically different, and that the marks have different connotations.Vittera urged the court to explain how standard character marks should be compared to design marks, and specifically argued that the court should "readdress and clarify" its ruling in Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
