Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 7301 - 7320 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2010, 4:51 am by zshapiro
Judge Reade, to the contrary used the 33:1 ratio found in the Guidelines at the time Brewer was sentenced. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
 The IPKat was a little disappointed, since it does spoil the fun of a trip to Luxembourg and back (remember: most felines sleep for 20 hours a day, so the pace of life in the tiny Duchy is just about right for them). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, in the Refco securities fraud litigation, the IPO's underwriters, including the three underwriter-defendants in this action, have agreed to settlements totaling $53 million (www.refcosecuritieslitigation.com). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Bexis
  But a defendant’s awareness that the stream of commerce may or will sweep the product into the forum State does not convert the mere act of placing the product into the stream into an act purposefully directed toward the forum State.480 U.S. 112 (all citations and quotation marks removed).Justice Brennan, speaking for another coterie of four justices, took the opposite view:The stream of commerce refers not to unpredictable currents or eddies, but to the regular and… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:26 am by David M. McLain
Defendant maintains that because the statute does not apply retroactively to expired policies, the new legislation does not apply to Plaintiff’s policy. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:44 am by Sheppard Mullin
Most of the cases settle quickly with roughly 20% reportedly settling for several thousands of dollars. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:16 am by SHG
  But then, marijuana remains a Schedule 1 substance and a federal crime. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
The decision rejects certain claims that the plaintiffs in that case --- a group of 20 states, along with a couple of individuals and a business association --- had brought to the Act. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Finally, while the court does not address the substance of the ATS&K Defendants' motions at this time, it offers one observation. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am by INFORRM
  Accordingly there is an obvious public interest in a false and misleading statement being countered or corrected”. [20] The Judge considered the applicable legal principles – dealing with section 12 of the Human Rights Act, the PCC Code and the analysis of section 12(3) in Cream Holdings v Bannerjee ([2005] 1 AC 253). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
A plaintiffs settling with one co-defendant under the comparative fault doctrine, does not establish a basis for dismissal as to the remaining defendant. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:48 pm by Kevin Funnell
Does the FDIC think it's scaring potential defendants into rolling over and playing dead? [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:51 am by Baker Hostetler Guest Author
”  Such job losses could affect as many as 20 million civilians directly engaged in the textile industry, and another 140 mill [read post]