Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 9,867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
Four people described as “sports stars” have become the latest celebrities to be named in American publications despite having injunctions in English courts. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
The ability of English courts to excise trivial claims from the daily court lists has been given legislative punch with the enactment of section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013, which requires plaintiffs to surmount the “serious harm” threshold in order to establish liability. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm
This gap of 368 days between libel jury trials appears to be the longest in English legal history. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
The immunity for witnesses in judicial proceedings from liability for damages related to their testimony originated in English common law.See Briscoe v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:33 am
Last week the Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am
The factors a Data Controller in Google’s position are required to consider were considered and discussed by the English High Court in NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) (see our blog here). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 152 (KB) We’ve seen previous instalments in this matter here and here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:57 am
On May 18, 2022, the Fifth Circuit held in Jarkesy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 10:56 am
Though the question presented was quite narrow and technical, the split in Artis v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Joint Equity Committee of Investors of Real Estate Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Surveillance Reuters had a piece “HK security chief says communications surveillance can come under security law” Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 27974-20 Garrity v Scotsman.com, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 12131-20 Emmett v Daily Mirror, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019, No breach – after investigation. 11860-20 Bunglawala v… [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
So it was perfectly acceptable--i.e., unlike the case with Bush v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:54 am
As the Massachusetts Supreme Court put it so well in Goodridge v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
She graduated summa cum laude with a BA in Philosophy and English from Loyola University New Orleans in 1999. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:45 am
Let me count the ways.First, the gnarled syntax is a crime against the English language. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
Additional Resources: Monson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
In EMI v Eircom Kelly J said, of the rights of privacy:"the statutory entitlements, whether they arise under the Data Protection legislation of the Postal and telecommunications legislation are subject to a provision which permits the confidentiality to be legitimately breached by an order of the Court. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
If you remember, Thomas and Pamela McIntosh v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:28 am
Another one of the Supreme Court’s forfeiture cases, Kaley v. [read post]
