Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 10:57 am
On Monday, the Court decided Taniguchi v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 10:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:37 am
The Judgment In the judgment the “Commissioner”, the retired English libel judge Sir Charles Gray, set out the legal background and the contentions of the parties but did not rule on the issue of meaning. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:31 am
The first is the influence of the Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:51 am
In its decision the BVerfG stressed that (like all other cases) cases relating to under-age celebrities required a case-by-case balancing of the conflicting rights (freedom of expression v personality right). [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:27 pm
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in Astrue v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:42 am
Fun fact: TIW is old english for TYR, which led to Tiw’s Day, which led to Tuesday. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:00 am
I then spent a year teaching English in Quito, Ecuador. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
The appellant finance company created a trust which operated under English law for the benefit of consumers who participated in a programme in the US and Canada. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am
[Toronto, Ont.] : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
Another view can be found in Rosalind English’s analysis of the speech. [read post]
20 May 2012, 11:47 pm
Related posts: Franzina on Negrepontis v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:09 am
Recent cases concerning defence powers have been based, not on the ambit of the ”forbidden area” ( Marchiori v Environment Agency [2002]), but on the notion that the government’s discretion in such matters is much wider (CND v Prime Minister [2002]; or that courts should be reticent (rather than constitutionally forbidden) to intervene (R v Jones [2006]). [read post]
20 May 2012, 4:23 am
" I suspect that the Thuuz algorithm worked overtime for a few minutes last week at the conclusion of the Manchester City v Queens Park Rangers English Premier League match. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
For example, will the serious harm test be more onerous than the current need for a tort to be real and substantial, as set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, or the “threshold of seriousness” considered in Cook v Telegraph [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB)? [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:50 am
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:57 am
Austin v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:48 am
See Samaniego v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:00 am
In Plain English: Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
