Search for: "J. G."
Results 7301 - 7320
of 8,319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
District Judge Nicholas G. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:42 pm
Here's the table of contents (available as a .pdf file): Avant-propos (Andrea Bonomi / Eleanor Cashin Ritaine); Première partie: Panorama introductif et principes généraux Le Règlement Rome I: la communautarisation et la modernisation de la Convention de Rome (Michael Wilderspin); La nouvelle synergie Rome I / Rome II / Bruxelles I (Eva Lein); The New Rome I Regulation on the Law… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Neither Judge Harry Pregerson, who wrote the majority opinion, nor Andrew J. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:04 pm
., for the Court, said, as follows: The test for the apportionment of costs under Rule 57(15) can be set out as follows: (1) the party seeking apportionment must establish that there are separate and discrete issues upon which the ultimately unsuccessful party succeeded at trial; (2) there must be a basis… [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
I. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:31 am
g. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:39 pm
Alchian, Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process, 21 J. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:51 pm
Evans, 526 F.3d 155, 167 (4th Cir. 2008) (Gregory, J., concurring). [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:43 pm
Lester, Brandishing the Mark of Cain: Defects in the Adam Walsh Act Michael Petrunik, Lisa Murphy, & J. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 11:15 am
Desde então, obtém notas máximas em ciência da computação e análise matemática e tem sido avaliado como gênio por seus professores. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:51 pm
Lester, Brandishing the Mark of Cain: Defects in the Adam Walsh Act Michael Petrunik, Lisa Murphy, & J. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:49 am
En observant simplement les zones géographiques renseignées par les rapports de connexion. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 10:45 pm
McDorman, Susan J. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:32 am
Here is how the opinion starts: Leon Williams appeals from a June 1, 2007, judgment of conviction and sentence of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sand, J.). [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:24 am
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2009] WLR (D) 80 “To rely on the defence in s 58(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 a defendant had to show an objectively ‘reasonable excuse’ for his action or possession and a ruling that neither a desire to ‘wind up’ prison officers nor mental illness could [...] [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:11 am
Regina v G (Terrorism: Information); Regina v J (terrorism: Information) House of Lords “To secure a conviction, the prosecution was not required to show that a defendant had had a terrorist purpose for collecting or recording information of a kind likely to be useful to a terrorist or possessing a document or record containing information of that [...] [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:12 am
Jonathan G. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:02 am
Delores G. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:30 am
R v G (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) R v J (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) R (on the application of Ahmad) (Respondent) v Mayor and Burgesses of London Borough of Newham (Appellants) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:25 pm
Harris, 2004 BCCA 146] that influence an award of non-pecuniary damages includes: (a) age of the plaintiff; (b) nature of the injury; (c) severity and duration of pain; (d) disability; (e) emotional suffering; and (f) loss or impairment of life; I would add the following factors, although they may arguably be subsumed in the above list: (g) impairment of family, marital and social… [read post]
