Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 7301 - 7320 of 10,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Public nuisances were interferences with public rights and were pursued by the Attorney General, his relator, or those who suffered harm which was unique or peculiar in character from the general public. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Had Germany still been using the deutsche mark, normal forces of supply and demand would have strengthened the mark, making Germany less competitive, while allowing the poorer countries to take away some of Germany’s export market share. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Comm’n of N.Y., 447 U.S. 530, 536 (1980) (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 8:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
When bars and restaurants reopened, schools stayed closed; when it became clear that children were less likely to infect others or become seriously ill themselves, schools stayed closed; when it became clear that school closures caused children significant harm, schools stayed closed; when it became clear that the poorest children were harmed most, schools stayed closed. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am by Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan
This post is the second of a five-part series on litigation about mail voting during the 2020 general election. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:37 pm
It is for that reason that, like a narcotic, it ought to be ingested with great caution and only to alleviate greater harm. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:07 am
  Anti-social activity, then, might be viewed as more threatening to the autonomy and dignity of the collective than specific manifestation in the harms suffered therefrom by the individual. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 7:03 pm
It is not always easy to tolerate or defend groups that criticize the state or those in power, but allowing them to function normally is an important test of democracy, and, ultimately, the mark of an open and free society. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 I’m going to talk briefly about last term’s Jack Daniels case—a trademark infringement and dilution case—as well as Elster, argued last week, in which the Justices appeared inclined to reject a First Amendment challenge to the refusal to register the claimed mark “TRUMP TOO SMALL” for t-shirts. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:35 am by jamison
  Either way, they pulled up the drawbridge and headed for the castle keep, where no harm from the outside could touch them. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
Can neighbours sue for historic contamination? [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:06 am by Shannon Raj Singh
The impact of mis- and disinformation is greater when it comes from a verified account, and the harm can be irreparable. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:16 am
Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Mark Begich (D-AK), introduced an amendment to the FY 2009 omnibus spending bill which they said "would maintain the public process for revisions to regulations under the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm by Mike
Hill failed to show the stun belt caused harm and denied the petition for habeas corpus. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/JMFzlU1Hkh -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-09-01 http://t.co/HCmtbXg4Z9 -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-09-01: Toronto residents upset by spam from Rob Ford http://… http://t.co/DPzRoUvj0u -> Home Depot probes possible credit card data breach http://t.co/NHNlEDtmBg -> CASL: Already 85 000 complaints filed at the CRTC http://t.co/GkuwdCSVqJ -> Chinese writings placed under UK copyright protection http://t.co/iunIGTb5v3 ->… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 6:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
Family Courts Jurisdiction is Limited to Family Offenses Committed Against Persons Listed in Family Court Act 812 Only In Matter of Janet GG v Robert GG,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5083241 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) in March 2010, petitioner (mother) filed a Family Ct Act article 8 petition alleging that respondent (father) committed a series of family offenses against her and their two children (born in 1996 and 1998). [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:58 am
" Slip op. at 25-26.Even if a "price impact" from increased or reduced demant "could be proven by common evidence, as with the loss of value model, plaintiffs have failed as a matter of law to adduce sufficient facts to show that the price impact model is a tenable measure of harm. [read post]