Search for: "PHILLIPS"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 11,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2011, 11:00 am
Within a few hours of the news that Phillip J. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
Phillips and Gregory L. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:12 am
Thank you, Phillip Closius. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:36 am
Judgment The Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) decided that arbitrators were not employees for the purposes of the Regulations because, drawing inference from the definition of “employment” under the Regulations which is “employment under a contract of service or of apprenticeship or a contract personally to do any work”, arbitrators are “independent providers of services who are not in a relationship of subordination with the… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:00 am
Born in Virginia Strict construction and states’ rights Died from heart attack Biography [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:14 pm
Phillips then apparently hen contacted the female FBI agent in an attempt to influence her not to disclose the existence of the affair. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
Leveson Inquiry | Lord Justice Leveson statement *** I’d like to thank Lawtel, Westlaw, Cassons For Counsel, City University Law School, David Phillips & Partners Solicitors, Inksters Solicitors, Iken, LBC Wise Counsel, Carrs Solicitors, JMW Solicitors – Manchester, Pannone and Cellmark for sponsoring the podcast – and the free student materials on Insite Law – appreciated. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:22 am
In that case, Phillips v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:16 am
Phillips added that the findings don’t mean the justices are more or less likely to vote for or against women attorneys in deciding a case. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:36 am
Phillip J. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:09 am
Jim Mulva, of course, has run ConocoPhillips since 2002 and been chairman since 2004; before that, he ran Phillips Petroleum for several years, and was on its board from 1994 on. [read post]
UK Supreme Court: Faith-Based Arbitration Requirement Does Not Violate Employment Discrimination Law
28 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
The majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke and Lord Dyson) also find that the Requirement would have fallen within the exception for genuine occupational requirements if the Regulations had applied. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm
On 26 July 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down a reserved judgment after the trial in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group ([2011] EWHC 1884 (QB)). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:09 pm
SHARON PHILLIPS, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 12:07 pm
Phillips, 985 F. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:18 am
This deed would sever the joint tenancy relationship between Aaron and Phillip. 5. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:25 am
Phillip J. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
The appeals were heard by a seven justice panel of Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Phillip I. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
The Fab Five are Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lady Hale of Richmond, Lord Mance of Frognal and Lord Collins of Mapesbury, of whom one (Lord Walker) has served time on the Patents Court and another (Lord Collins) has presided over a pretty robust bit of patent litigation himself. [read post]
