Search for: "People v. House"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 12,873
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
”IMAGING DEVICE means any mechanical, digital or electronic viewing device, camera or any other instrument capable of recording, storing or transmitting visual images that can be utilized to observe a person (Penal Law § 250.40[2]).SURREPTITIOUSLY means that the act was done stealthily or secretively (People v Piznarski,113 AD3d 166 [3rd Dept 2013], citing Dictionary.com [Dictionary.com Unabridged, Random House, Inc.]). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:53 pm
If she can get signed statements from other people about the problems, well and good. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:15 am
Put enough exceptions next to each other and you come out with a decision like State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:55 pm
The property is a three bed house. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
In both types of cases, the social landlord is pursuing proceedings in order to recover property that might be used to provide accommodation for other homeless people. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 2:06 pm
They did so on the basis that they were concerned about those nasty southerners taking advantage of their cheaper housing, such that Sandwell would be flooded with people from outside. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
And there are real people in those jobs, people with families to feed. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm
In Chittenden v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm
In Chittenden v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:50 pm
The defense is also mistaken in its reliance on People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:22 pm
In Chittenden v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:20 am
Kaiser v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am
Sheehan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Thomas McDonnell blogged about “Murphy’s Law of Tax” and Ian Gamble described the findings in Henco Industries v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
The Court ruled to reject the appeal, upholding the decisions of both the Outer and Inner House of the Court of Session that the blanket ban is not unlawful: Moohan, Gibson and Gillon Petitioners, [2013] CSOH 199 and [2014] CSIH 56. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court in Riley v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
This is hardly bulk collection in the sense that worries Glenn Greewald and others, but would seem to be precluded by a law that restricts collection to the identification of individual accounts or people. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:41 am
People v. [read post]
