Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2007, 11:17 am
In a case that mentions Rambo and quotes from 12 Angry Men, a Ninth Circuit panel today in US v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 1:39 pm
Special Report: Emergencies and the Law The Evolution of the War Measures ActMarjun Parcasio Laws such as the War Measures Act and the Emergencies Act give governments extraordinary powers to respond to emergencies. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:06 am
Thisltethwaite continues: Here’s the point: If you are content to think that corporations are people and money is speech, as the Supreme Court decided in the by a vote of 5-4, in their Citizens United v Federal Election Commission decision, then indeed you are sleepwalking through your citizenship and giving over your faith to false prophets. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:33 pm
"One way to do that is by cracking down on foreigners because it increases nationalism, which helps keep the ruling regime in power. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:15 pm
It is because it makes sense to give the people that control them (who are not necessarily their owners) the power to use the corporate form to amplify their voices. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:10 pm
The case is Loving v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:35 pm
For more, see the Alliance for Justice's great new report, AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:35 pm
For more, see the Alliance for Justice's great new report, AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:36 am
The Supreme Court struck indefinite detention down as an affront to liberty in Zadvydas v. [read post]
FTC Outlines Remedy Concerns in Amicus Brief After Jury Finds Google Illegally Monopolized App Store
13 Aug 2024, 7:18 pm
Looking forward in cases like Epic v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:42 am
In some ways she might not have understood at the time (although I suspect she might have), her testimony was a powerful and yet gentle rebuke to commentators critical and even supportive of the Supreme Court’s decision in Santa Clara Pueblo v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 3:52 pm
The familiar hot-button controversies -- abortion, affirmative action, the death penalty, police powers and so on -- have been around so long, sifted and resifted so many times, that they now arrive at the court in highly specific cases affecting few, if any, real people. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:56 am
Innocent people can and do get sentenced to death in Texas and across the country. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:10 pm
Most people today “watch” their news on television or the Internet. [read post]
26 May 2025, 8:55 am
The point is not to accommodate the powerful. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm
Does the institution have a statutory power or duty to carry out the activity that resulted in the creation of the record? [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
I said it dangerously over-estimated the power of procedural mechanisms like counter-notice to get legal speech back online once platforms take it down. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:59 am
At the start of this year, Nokia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:41 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
