Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 21,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2007, 5:29 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:42 am
YA Global Investments, LP v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
Caddo v. Siemens: Microsoft Settlement Covers Downstream Use and No Jurisdiction Over Foreign Parent
24 Sep 2023, 11:55 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:37 am
Comprehensive State Privacy Laws, including the CCPA. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:04 am
Jones v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:19 pm
The second, Banks v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Attorney Preet Bharara brought the seizure and forfeiture action of United States Of America v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:59 am
Atari said no in respect of sales prior to 26 July 2001. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:23 am
The “focus” of the statute, the Court ruled, is “upon purchases and sales of securities in the United States”; as a result, the statute “reaches … only … the purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
This was the evidence of one Dr Greg Bacon, who had been a sales representative of the defendants, but who had been sacked for promoting off-label sales. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
United States, in which the Court held that “‘a robber who affects or attempts to affect even the intrastate sale of marijuana grown within the state’ necessarily satisfies the ‘affects commerce’ element of the federal Hobbs Act criminal statute. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:23 am
Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
As recently as this Order to Show Cause, Defendant has stated — notably for the first time — that a sheriff’s sale would afford the opportunity to “consider trying to borrow money (if he could) and buy [the malpractice cause(s) of action] for himself in order to protect his former attorneys [*4](including a childhood friend) from frivolous and legally-baseless claims” (Def Memo at 16). [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:37 pm
Pahnke v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:11 am
A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the much-awaited decision Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, C-230/16. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:49 am
Sales v. [read post]
