Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am
Ahmed v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
Alonzo v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:10 pm
Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:03 pm
Born in the Gaza Strip, they moved to Saudi Arabia, and then to Egypt, and ultimately to the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:46 pm
By K&L Gates Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
Securities and Exchange Commission that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Occidental, and Sarei v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Occidental, and Sarei v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am
This sense of responsibility was exemplary, and I hope the United States District Court for the Northern District of California--sort of my other "home court"--will protect judges, court staff, counsel, parties, and a press pool member at a comparably high level when the Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:38 pm
Browning, Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in 1988–1989. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
If the California state courts share my concerns about overbreadth, they should consider embracing the very sensible rules for search warrants for computer hard drives (in any case, not just those involving journalists) adopted last year by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:41 pm
See, e.g., Gunder’s Auto Center v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
LaserCase number: 09-cv-09144 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2009Qualifying judgment/order: February 12, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-30 SEC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:17 am
United States, No. 06-876L (Feb. 22, 2008), a San Diego, California-area property owner sued the federal government in the Court of Federal Claims for just compensation, complaining of the Border Patrol's violation of its property rights:As a result of these initiatives since September 11, 2001, IIP states that Border Patrol agents occupy Parcel 11 on an around-the-clock basis. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
California or Brecht v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 4:59 am
The Supreme Court will here today the arguments in Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 12:58 pm
" In United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:54 pm
The court in United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
