Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 7301 - 7320
of 40,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
UPDATED: June 21, 2010 at 11:55 am Straight from the Broken Record department, the United States Supreme Court has again not issued a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 12:41 pm
That case, Fitisemanu v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
*The Appellate Division opined that "petitioner was accorded his full right to explain his conduct," and that he was not entitled to a hearing, citing Matter of Shraeder v Kern, 287 N.Y. 13. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
*The Appellate Division opined that "petitioner was accorded his full right to explain his conduct," and that he was not entitled to a hearing, citing Matter of Shraeder v Kern, 287 N.Y. 13. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:08 pm
Caresse Navigation Ltd v Zurich Assurances Maroc & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 1366 A cargo of coal was carried by the Respondent Owners from Rotterdam to Nador (Morocco). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:15 pm
Chief Justice Roberts returned to the language again in his separate opinion in United States v. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
”[8] In other words, the Court must be shown that the earlier decision is plainly erroneous or manifestly wrong. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
”[8] In other words, the Court must be shown that the earlier decision is plainly erroneous or manifestly wrong. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:25 am
In Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-132/05 February 26, 2008), the European Court of Justice held that "Since the Federal Republic of Germany has therefore failed to show that the name ‘Parmesan' has become generic, use of the word ‘Parmesan' for cheese which does not comply with the specification for the Protected Designation of… [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
The UKIPO wrote a letter to ConveTec on 25 October 2011 (which can be seen at IPSUM here) confirming that the amendment was considered allowable, but also stating "However, consequential amendments should be made to the description with the insertion of a statement of invention that is consistent with the wording of the amended claim 1". [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 11:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 2:38 pm
Why is it that, when the words "population" and "warren" appear in close proximity, this Kat struggles to exclude from his mind the word which unites them: "rabbit"? [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:30 am
The defendant in New Jersey v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:07 am
In Licata Jewelers, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:39 am
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:39 am
State v. [read post]
