Search for: "Summers v. Summers" Results 7301 - 7320 of 9,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2010, 7:16 am by INFORRM
Last summer, Alastair Brett chaired a committee which looked into a Civil Legal Aid Fund for libel and privacy actions for Lord Justice Rupert Jackson and his High Court costs review. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
First up is State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Michael Scutt
The druids, hippies and other odd-bods who really ought to have jobs to go to gathered at Stonehenge to celebrate the summer solstice and, perhaps, to mourn the likely continuing lack of a decent visitor centre serving a palatable vegetarian option. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:56 am by Chris Schmiedeke
A discussion of a standard visitation order for Texas can be found here: Weekend possessions Thursday possessions Summer possessions Holiday possessions Expanded standard visitation simply adds time on to the standard possession order. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:03 am by Kashmir Hill
Like the Supreme Court sometimes does, at least in Maryland v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:48 am by Erin Miller
The Court is in recess for the summer, and is expected to return on October 4 for the first oral argument of October Term 2010. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   Global - Trade Marks / Brands The branding Summer of our content and discontent (IPKat) Brands and obesity: How do innovation and regulation fit in? [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 10:17 pm by Simon Gibbs
The second was 39 Essex Street's Summer Garden Party. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:18 pm by J.W Verret
I’ve been working over the summer writing my August submission. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
A couple of weeks ago, the AmeriKat wrote about Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in the much-awaited Supreme Court case of Bilski v Kappos. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:58 am by charonqc
  As summer kicks in there is less work to do, fewer cases to analyse or laws to comment on. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:37 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Judge Leon previously balked at dismissing the indictment, finding that the federal obscenity laws were not unconstitutionally vague as applied to Internet speech.The trial is not expected to supplant the Washington Monument or the Smithsonian as a favorite tourist attraction among the throngs of D.C.'s summer visitors. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
About 6 degrees off-beam should be okay (see Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith, here). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 7:50 am by Stephen Fairley
It's almost taking law firm marketing back to the Stone Age—or at least pre Bates v State Bar of Arizona (1977). [read post]