Search for: "Washington v. State" Results 7301 - 7320 of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2009, 5:51 am
  DeJesus-Rueff cites a fascinating anecdote about Chief Justice Warren's experiences immediately before the Brown v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:53 am by Phil Cave
" On General Washington’s 280th birthday, the Supreme Court will hear argument on whether a modern version of the latter provision is constitutional in United States v.Alvarez, No. 11-210. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
H-Net adds some interesting reviews this week, including one of David V. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Bursch, and Detroit lawyer George Washington in the affirmative action case of Schuette -v- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
  He asked the states’ defender, Washington, D.C., attorney Paul D. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:06 am by Brando Simeo Starkey
Basically every scholar who has written anything on intent and equal protection repeats the same line: The Supreme Court announced the Intent Doctrine in Washington v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:21 am by Zoe Tillman
Paul Wolf, who practices in Washington and Colorado in the United States as well as in Colombia, filed a Download Does v Boies Schiller complaintcomplaint yesterday in U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 1:08 pm
In UW Must Defend its Handling of Student Rape by Football Player posted at Title IX Blog, we get a discussion about the decision by the Washington State Court of Appeals which reinstated a Title IX case against the University of Washington over the handling of a rape case against a UW football player. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm by My name
  As the report states, in the case of AIG, the guarantee was extended not only to AIG itself but to its counterparties in its derivatives trades, leaving the government guaranteeing not only banks, but an entire market. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:29 pm
As such, it is not a state agency for the purposes of state action immunity, the AAA argued.The brief is Shames v. [read post]