Search for: "BES v. State" Results 7321 - 7340 of 68,870
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in USA Today on the strikingly absolutist language being used by Democratic leaders in defining the right to abortion after the Supreme Court’s leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
They risk being sued by the Defendant in this case, the New York State Attorney General. [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:09 pm by JURIST Staff
Automatism as previously defined by the Court is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R v Stone, paragraph 156). [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:28 pm
So this whole time, he's been in state facilities at the state's expense. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am by Jennifer Davis
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) and Yasui v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am by Eleonora Rosati
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that Ms… [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:01 am by Rayhan Asat
To meet the high threshold of this intent, genocidal intent must be the only reasonable inference that can be made from the pattern of the state’s actions, according to the international court in Prosecutor v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
ColbIn his draft opinion for the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Davis and his coauthors situate their argument for antiracist antitrust law in the context of Cung Le v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]