Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 7321 - 7340 of 8,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:17 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, there is one case before the CCB that stands out to me, Benjamin Bronner v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 2:49 pm
Last Tuesday, i4i announced that the USPTO confirmed the validity of all the claims in one of the patents subject to the dispute in the i4i v Microsoft litigation which saw i4i receive a $290 million jury award (see previous IPKat posts here). [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
Hoeflich and Stephen Sheppard, Lucy and the Judge:  Wood v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  The term "Terry frisks" comes from the Supreme Court decision Terry v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:06 am by David Lat
Blackmun and Antonin Scalia did in their dueling separate opinions in a 1992 abortion case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
 In this memo, Practice Center Contributor Stan Keller discusses what might happen now: With the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit having struck down Rule 14a-11 in Business Roundtable et al v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 8:45 am by Joy Waltemath
In dismissing the lawsuit and denying the union’s motion for emergency relief as moot, the court urged the parties to pursue arbitration swiftly if their continued good-faith efforts to reach an amicable resolution failed since “[l]ives may hang in the balance, and the union nurses deserve as much” (New York State Nurses Association v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:59 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
The battle of experts is very real, and it’s very important in a personal injury case. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:54 am by @travelblawg
Such regulations survive only if they are narrowly drawn to achieve a compelling state interest. [read post]