Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 7321 - 7340 of 13,889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2018, 5:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Rent-A-Tribe: Using tribal immunity to shield patents from administrative review. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:34 pm by Patrick Ziepolt
For example, parties argued about whether capturing a vicious dog was “law enforcement” or mere “administrative procedure. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
District Court for the Northern District of Californiarecently issued in a civil case:  SunPower Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 1:56 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
At para 70, the Court cited its decision in R. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:22 pm by John E. Villafranco
Q: It has been nearly a year since the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 11:07 am
Attorney's Office in Hawaii, John Peyton was the Chief of Litigation in the CIA. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
In the Courts Mahanoy Area School District v B.L. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
David StevensonCase Number: 15-cv-03528 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case Filed: May 26, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 29, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-63 In the Matter of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corporation Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-16567 Case Filed: June 1, 2015 Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 1, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-62 SEC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
The trial court tossed the search, and in State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  I particularly like Jack’s placing the central arguments of the book within the larger political context of the Reagan Administration and the particular role played by the unsung “hero” Edwin Meese. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:51 am by Bill Otis
Lynch said point-blank at her confirmation hearing that she opposes the legalization of marijuana.Thus it would be not merely inconsistent with standing law (affirmed by the Supreme Court in Gonzales v. [read post]