Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 7321 - 7340 of 40,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 1:32 am by Tessa Shepperson
Here is your news on a Friday at the start of Lockdown #2. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Daniel Jin
The fine was levied under both Article 5(1)(f) (which has a cap of 4% of worldwide turnover) and Article 32 (which has a 2% cap), but as the fine in actuality represents less than 1% of Marriott’s turnover this distinction (i.e. that between the amounts able to be fined for breaches of the two articles in play) was not regarded as a significant factor (in itself this distinction in the caps is interesting given the obligations under both Articles are very similar – both require… [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 2 November 2020, London’s High Court handed down its hotly anticipated judgment in the high-profile libel case brought by Hollywood actor Johnny Depp over a newspaper article which labelled him a “wife-beater”. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 1:27 pm by Amy Howe
The House of Representatives and a group of Democratic-controlled states, led by California, had entered the case to defend the law. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 12:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Nov. 2, 2020) Plaintiff/counterdefendant ThermoLife and defendant/counterplaintiff HumanN both hold patents related to the use of nitrate technology for supplements. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:37 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Since a choice of court agreement is a term of the contract, does the principle of contract law apply to determine a choice of court agreement? [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 10:13 am by Eugene Volokh
[(1) Black Lives Matter demonstrations. (2) Trump-fans-vs. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Defamation: Requires that “(1) the defendant published a false statement; (2) that defamed the plaintiff; (3) with the requisite degree of fault regarding the truth of the statement (negligence if the plaintiff is a private individual); and (4) damages, unless the statement constitutes defamation per se. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
And neither does any part of the federal government that answers to him. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
However, under section 2 of the 2013 Act a defendant does not have to prove the truth of each and every imputation, where the imputation not established as substantially true does not cause serious harm to the claimant’s reputation. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:49 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
R Street does not discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, era of military service, gender identity, relationship structure or anything else that's illegal, immoral or nonsensical to use as a basis for hiring, and encourage all qualified applicants to apply. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Two aspects of this case, taken together, persuade us that the Court of Appeals should have certified to the Louisiana Supreme Court the questions (1) whether Mckesson could have breached a duty of care in organizing and leading the protest and (2) whether Officer Doe has alleged a particular risk within the scope of protection afforded by the duty, provided one exists. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:00 am by Carla Laroche
Voisine’s rationale does not require the Supreme Court to hold otherwise, and neither does the ACCA’s legislative history, Borden explains. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Will Geer
Corim, Inc., 262 Ga. 364, 365 n.2, 418 S.E.2d 601, 602 n.2 (1992). [read post]