Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 7321 - 7340 of 7,360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2006, 1:12 pm
" Judge Berzon, dissenting, begins her opinion this way: "The majority's peculiar interpretation of the word 'reasonableness' not only defies its common usage in the English language, but more importantly, runs contrary to what this court decided, sitting en banc, in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
The 2006 amendment preempts state and federal dilution actions against federally registered marks, which also helps big TM owners. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
De Landtsheer - the AG's OpinionThe Opinion of Advocate General Paolo Mengozzi in Case C-381/05 De Landtsheer Emmanuel SA v Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne and Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin SA has now been posted on the Curia website, alas not in English. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 4:10 pm
Refusing to appear in a civil court in the United States is an option but not an advisable one. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:46 pm
Since different EU Member States appear to have different means of computing the five-year non-use period, this question is ripe for harmonisation. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 6:57 am
The moral virtues are states of character concerned with choice; examples include courage, temperance and justice. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 10:03 am
"You should recall the press gangs every time you hear sentimental drivel about English law. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 1:30 am
The Opinion of Advocate General Poiares Maduro was, alas, not made available in English. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:59 am
But Merpel asks, if you stick a piece of French into a translation program and it comes out in English, who owns the copyright in the English translation ...? [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
United Kingdom, at para. 36), whereas conversely, the inability of the police to commit a certain tort in English law (as a point of substantive law) is often described as an ‘immunity’ (see for criticism of this terminology Barrett v. [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 2:03 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 8:18 am
In the context of an action for the recognition of an English money judgment in the District of Columbia, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed the preclusive effect of the Act of State doctrine. [read post]