Search for: "In re T. W." Results 7321 - 7340 of 8,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2009, 2:11 am
You're pleading passivity and impotence but you want us to think you have what it takes to be President of the United States? [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:15 am
And we would say this: If you don't have insurance now, you'll be able to get it, probably free, if you're among the low-income working poor. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
   Posted by:  Author and probate attorney Andrew W. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 2:29 pm
You can't say, 'but I need to make a fortune instead,' because that's not happening right now. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:30 am by Moseley Collins
Vasold (1966) 65 Cal.2d 166, 179-180 [ [W]hatever manner of calculation is proposed by counsel or employed by the jury, the verdict must meet the test of reasonableness.... [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
Well, we're getting pretty close to November 15th. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:13 pm by Greg May
I’ll be straight with you here: I haven’t read the combined 107 pages of opinions. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:34 pm
Ein solches Argument liefe letztlich darauf hinaus, den Irrtum über die Strafbarkeit eines bestimmten Verhaltens als einen den Vorsatz ausschliessenden Sachverhaltsirrtum zu qualifizieren, was unrichtig wäre. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
And most of these cases aren't even drug cases. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 6:20 am
The change provides that an examiner won't be penalized performance-wise based upon a single clear error in Patentability Determination. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:33 am by John L. Welch
In re Tires, Tires, Tires, Inc., Serial No. 77091459 (November 4, 2009) [precedential]Genericness: Applicant maintained that TIRES TIRES TIRES is a unitary phrase and therefore that, to prove genericness, Examining Attorney Timothy J. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Traditionally we instruct jurors every day, don't talk about the case, don't read about it in the newspapers etc. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 9:01 pm
You're probably thinking "is this guy nuts? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:21 pm
If you're the top lawyer in a field that falls apart, of course you will have clients who suffer setbacks. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:09 pm by A. Benjamin Spencer
Mopex, Inc., 215 F.R.D. 87, 90-91 (S.D.N.Y.2002) (“[W]here magistrate judges prohibit a party from asserting a potential claim, courts tend to review the preclusion of such a claim under a ‘clearly erroneous' standard. [read post]