Search for: "J. G." Results 7321 - 7340 of 8,319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
Waldrip, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): Bill G. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 2:41 am
Lorsque l'utilisation d'un médicament particulier pour traiter une maladie particulière est déjà connue, ce médicament connu peut-il être breveté, en vertu des dispositions des articles 53 c) et 54(5) CBE 2000, pour son utilisation dans un traitement thérapeutique… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:18 am by dennis l. hall
Such works thus lie at the heart of the fair use doctrine's guarantee of breathing space within the confines of copyright, see, e. g., Sony, supra, at 478-480 (Blackmun, J., dissenting), and the more transformative the new work, the less will be the significance of other factors, like commercialism, that may weigh against a finding of fair use.In contrast, Judge Posner has viewed fair use from an economic perspective. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:18 am by dennis l. hall
Such works thus lie at the heart of the fair use doctrine's guarantee of breathing space within the confines of copyright, see, e. g., Sony, supra, at 478-480 (Blackmun, J., dissenting), and the more transformative the new work, the less will be the significance of other factors, like commercialism, that may weigh against a finding of fair use.In contrast, Judge Posner has viewed fair use from an economic perspective. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:12 am
The statute defines identifying information as follows:`Identifying information' includes, but is not limited to, a:(A) Social security number;(B) Driver's license number;(C) Checking account number;(D) Savings account number;(E) Credit card number;(F) Debit card number;(G) Personal identification number;(H) Electronic identification number;(I) Digital signature; or(J) Any other number or information that can be used to access a person's financial resources. . . . [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:44 pm
The Quebecor submission [zip] includes the following: Certains participants à la présente instance ont déjà fait état de situations où le contrôle de contenus peut être bénéfique non seulement pour les utilisateurs de services Internet mais pour la société en général. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:23 am
Après avoir décidé dans le cas d'espèce que la requête tardive pouvait être admise car les modifications pouvaient être raisonnablement traitées sans report de la procédure orale, la Chambre s'estime interdite par l'Art 13(3) RPCR d'exercer le pouvoir… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]