Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 7321 - 7340
of 35,340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am
Adams, 19-309 Issues: (1) Whether the First Amendment invalidates a longstanding state constitutional provision that limits judges affiliated with any one political party to no more than a “bare majority” on the state’s three highest courts, with the other seats reserved for judges affiliated with the “other major political party”; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
United States written by Justice John Marshall Harlan, held that a trial judge has no responsibility to inform the jury of the right to nullify laws. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
United States written by Justice John Marshall Harlan, held that a trial judge has no responsibility to inform the jury of the right to nullify laws. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 10:01 pm
In United States et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
On Nov. 26, Judge Michael H. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:29 am
In 1955, the Court said in Quinn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 5:06 am
As the court stated repeatedly, it was adopting the same position as the district court in Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm
On November 13, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requested the U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:34 pm
In Broke Ass Phone v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:53 pm
Uber argued that the FAA applies to its arbitration provision because it involves commerce as the Uber app is available to riders and transportation providers in over 175 cities across the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:57 am
All parties agree that after United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:30 am
” Gibbons v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Cox:As provided by Title 28, Section 508(B) of the United States Code and Title 28, Section 0.132(A) of the Code of Federal Regulations, I have today assumed the duties of Acting Attorney General.In that capacity I am, as instructed by the President, discharging you, effective a [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Brief for United States 60–61; Tr. of Oral Arg. 49–50 (Mar. 26,2012). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:53 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument from appellant Qualcomm and appellee the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the antitrust matter originating from the Northern District of California on Thursday, February 13, 2020, at 9:30 AM Pacific Time.The court's website does not yet list the circuit judges on the panel. [read post]
