Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 7321 - 7340 of 8,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 1:47 am by streetartandlaw
The ordinary observer test asks whether “an average lay observer would recognize [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bagley, No. 05-4461 I'n a capital case in which petitioner was convicted of murdering his sons as they lay sleeping, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where state courts' rejection of a claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance during the penalty phase of the trial by failing adequately to investigate his mental-health history and background, was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:00 am by Rouguiatou Balde
Quelles sont les mesures adoptées par les autorités pour faire face par exemple aux violences récentes commises lors des événements dits du 28 Septembre 2009 ? [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
Earlier I posted about the European Commission’s Communication on Illegal Content Online. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
              The figures also suggest that the negative bias of some lay investors towards derivatives is wrong. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
In updated F-V, 3, the two steps taken by examiners to assess unity of invention, carried over from former F-V, 2, are broken down and explained in greater detail. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  A purported derogation which makes this impossible would therefore not be compatible with the standards Article 23(1)(i) itself lays down. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
For that point, the brief sites Seymour v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Toutefois, Diesel s’est opposée à la demande de Point Zero au motif que la marque convoitée créait de la confusion avec les marques de commerce et Point Zero n’a pas produit de contre-déclaration ni de preuve dans le délai prescrit; sa demande a été réputée abandonnée en 2009. [read post]