Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 7321 - 7340
of 120,415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
In MTA Canada Royalty Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:11 am
The Court ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:43 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Wednesday that localities may not deny permission to build cell phone towers. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:59 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF; merit briefs] Tuesday in Dolan v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:09 am
Practice point: The critical inquiry in determining whether an employment relationship exists pertains to the degree of control exercised by the purported employer over the results produced or the means used to achieve the results.Student note: Where the proof on the issue of control presents no conflict in evidence or is undisputed, the matter may properly be determined as a matter of law.Case: Barak v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:12 am
Wilson v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:30 am
Commissioner, Docket No. 10095-22 (May 4, 2023), Judge Buch teaches us... [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:37 am
If a franchisee allegedly breaches its agreement such that Dunkin terminates the license, and the licensee continues to use the trademarks, then in addition to any contractual claims, there may be trademark claims as well: Dunkin Donuts v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 5:09 pm
By Kristin Billera "This case stems from a dangerous, cruel, and highly indecent use of the internet for the apparent purpose of revenge," begins the opinion of Barnes v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] agreed [order list, PDF] Monday to hear oral arguments in the case of South Carolina v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:50 am
Maric Capital Master Fund, Ltd v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:35 am
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] on Monday held [opinion, PDF] in Associated Press v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 11:11 pm
Practice point: In the absence of fraud or a covenant, a commercial lessor does not represent that the premises are tenantable and may be used for the purpose for which they are apparently intended.Student note: The implied warranty of habitability applies only to residential lease space, pursuant to Real Property Law § 235-b.Case: Disunno v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: Google, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 8:33 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] on Tuesday issued an order [text, PDF] in Zubik v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:45 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in Jesinoski v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
In South Carolina v. [read post]
