Search for: "Michaels v State" Results 7321 - 7340 of 13,662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:42 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today, Drew Boortz has an interesting post on the Michigan Film Office granting a 40% refundable tax credit for the development of a video game, the first time this has happened in the state. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:13 am by charley foster
Kauai Police Commission Chairman Michael Ching subsequently asked the OIP to determine whether the closed meeting was proper under the state sunshine law. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:57 pm
  The piece is titled "Of Atkins and Men: Deviations from Clinical Definitions of Mental Retardation in Death Penalty Cases", and here is the abstract: Under Atkins v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 3:42 pm
Best scholarly treatment of the subject is Professor Michael Kent Curtis's No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights (1986). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Kyle Krull
The state (Massachusetts) denied the claim and the appeals court upheld the state's decision. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:25 pm
Michael Udowychenko (Fla. 5th DCA, opinion filed July 6th, 2012, Case No. 5D11-720). [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:45 am
--Michael Washburn, SF Chronicle. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:47 pm by Michael DeRose
This bill comes at a time when public sector unions across New Jersey and the rest of the Country await the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 9:10 am by Tom Smith
via www.realclearpolitics.com Joe Biden is a Catholic the way Michael Corleone was a Catholic. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:45 am by Barbara Moreno
Forsythe, Clarke D., Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:47 pm by Michael DeRose
This bill comes at a time when public sector unions across New Jersey and the rest of the Country await the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:29 am by admin
Moore A federal grand jury in New York Jan. 3 indicted three Swiss men working as client advisers to a Swiss bank for helping U.S. taxpayers hide more than $1.2 billion in assets (United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
Title 59 Chapter 27 is a content-based tax that violates the First Amendment; and 2) whether that tax passes intermediate scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Michael Glennon contested Jack Goldsmith’s comparison of the U.N. [read post]